![]() ![]() I think the question they would ask themselves is whether or not they make more money withĪ. Chances are they do just want access to the code directly for their specific hardware. I don't really see the point in taking Game Maker and closing it off so no one can use it. Nothing to do with gambling IMO, all to do with sideways expansion. PlayTech have quite a narrow product base, this move is going to diversify their revenue streams. If PlayTech can use the licensing potential effectively by encouraging publishing deals with high-risk and low cost developers, provide improved customer support, and reduce the cost of the software through economies of scale (they're on the FTSE250 which isn't bad!) then they're looking at a product that will grow and make money. GM has three things going for it: 1) it's popular and well-known, 2) it exports to many common platforms, 3) it attracts innovative rather than technical developers due to ease of workflow. ![]() You generally don't buy a tech company unless it has something that's of significant immediate interest. GM is really not a secure platform and its Linux support is ropey at best. Techniques for video lottery (as it's known) dev are well-established and, most of all, secure. ![]() GM is closed source but your theories on slot development are well wide of the mark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |